|
And then had no choice but to use there "flat" $450 repair. I guess I got the short end of the stick on this one. We use it as a our color corrected monitor for high end photography for major ad agencies and magazines worldwide. But I figured I have had TV's last forever.
my 23" cinema display worked beautifully right up until 3 weeks after the 1 year warranty was up and then it just went black. Which by the way, has only a 90 day warranty from the new repair. I just wish it did not suddenly go black, apparently due to some kind of inner power circuit. I was forced to have Apple send it to there repair people for a flat fee of $450.
As a monitor, it is one of the best. So get the extended warranty and enjoy it. I do find it rediculous that a high end product like this lasted just 13 months till it died. I really should have gotten the extended warranty which would have covered it for 3 years.
If you need a monitor right now I'd look into NEC's high end 24" and 26" monitors. I'd encourage people to wait until Macworld '09 in SF this January, where they will likely introtuce new models with more competitive features (wide gamut, better viewing angles, contrast ratio, etc). This monitor lacks a lot of features, and it makes sense because it was released in mid 2004. Apple has also officially DISCONTINUED it if you look on their web site.
It is about 100$ more for that version. If you want a good photo editing 24in LCD look at the NEC 2490WUXi. Check out Reviews and you will find it is a pro quality monitor that matches monitors 2-3x the price. It has an A-TW polarizer which increases the viewing angle and comes with an internal LUT for better calibration.
Apple monitors are seriously overpriced. There are "spectraview" packages that include a one eye calibrator and NEC's software. There is also a 26in version (2690WUXi) that is Wide Gamut, for those than need it. It is a decent monitor, just much too expensive.
Colorcomp help insure even colors across the the screen. Check out Hardforum.com for LOTS of good info on the subject. For your money there are better alternatives. It is about 200 more but the screen is much better.
That one had an obvious pink cast to it that was hard to correct even with calibration, but both of the new ones are beautiful and quite color "neutral." The 1920x1200 feels like a lot of room to work but not "too much".if that's even possible. The one at work was purchased to replace a 2004 model 23" Cinema HD (same model, just older) one that was stolen. If you can afford it, go for it. I have one at work (I'm a graphic and web designer for an Ad agency) and now one at home and love them both. Both were purchased here at Amazon in August '08.
It's by far the best monitor of any kind that I've seen yet. A utility called "WinACD" helps enormously when using it with a Windows PC. It so impressed me, I bought a Mac Pro to go with it.I seem to have gotten one of the perfect ones with even backlighting and color and no dead or stuck pixels.Details are sharp and clear and video plays well with no noticeable ghosting or jaggies. It's got great details like a single cable connecting the monitor to a breakout box at the computer end, Firewire 400 and USB ports and unobtrusive touch switches for power and brightness.
I originally bought this for my PC-based NLE workstation. Have Fun,KeriUpdate: I confirmed that the incompatibility with my PC was a fault of the Video Card, not this monitor. Fine details can be seen that aren't noticeable on other nearly as expensive monitors. It's not 100% PC compatible, as my system refused to boot with only this display connected to an ATI 3850 video card.
The power indicator thoughtfully goes dark during use to reduce distraction. A BIOS update of the Video Card resolved the issue with this and certain other DVI monitors. It would boot OK with 2 displays connected, so I used it for a few weeks. The monitor is well made with a solid aluminum frame and stand.
|
